[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: REMINDER: Call for review of RFC 2618bis-2621bis

To: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>, "Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>
Subject: Re: REMINDER: Call for review of RFC 2618bis-2621bis
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 09:53:30 +0300
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0509142240090.7894@internaut.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0509142240090.7894@internaut.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-rfc2618bis-00.txt

I read this. The content seems OK (but I'm not much of an MIB
expert).

But I do have a question. The document "updates RFC 2618",
but as far as I can determine, it contains all the objects from
2618 and then adds some. If so, why isn't the designation
"Obsoletes RFC 2618"?

--Jari


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- REMINDER: Call for review of RFC 2618bis-2621bis
  - From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>

Prev by Date: REMINDER: Call for review of RFC 2618bis-2621bis
Next by Date: RE: Issue 101: WG Last Call Review
Previous by thread: REMINDER: Call for review of RFC 2618bis-2621bis
Next by thread: RE: REMINDER: Call for review of RFC 2618bis-2621bis
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread