Re: [Geopriv] RE: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo-04.txt

[Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>]

> The inclusion of the "entity" field reintroduces the problem we had with the
> initial draft, which is that no practical mechanism has been identified
> through which the NAS would know the location of the host attempting
> attachment.

Existing access points support user location determination, right?
See:
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2005/050505-cisco-airespace.html
http://www.arubanetworks.com/pdf/rf-location.pdf

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>