[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Radext vlan,priority, filtering RFC - new draft (00d)

Sorry, I can't find this draft, is it released yet?

Thanks,

Madjid

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Congdon, Paul T (ProCurve)
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 10:48 AM
To: Bernard Aboba; Sanchez, Mauricio (PNB Roseville)
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Radext vlan,priority, filtering RFC - new draft (00d)

 
> Subject: RE: Radext vlan,priority, filtering RFC - new draft (00d)
> 
> > Here is a new updated draft, -00d.  Changes in this version are:
> > - section 3.5: Propose new NAS-filter-rule argument 
> (redir_cnt) to an 
> > http redirect rule.  Allows a rule to match a set number of times 
> > before NAS removes it from the active rule set.
> 
> Before adding this, I'd like to see if there is widespread 
> support for this particular "whistle".
> 

There are more than 20 people working in GSMA that have requested and
support this feature.  It has been limited to http only and is supported
by the design team.  It is currently in the base draft, so we can
discuss comments around this during the WG review of the document.

Paul

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>