RE: Comments on draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-04.txt

[Parviz Yegani <pyegani@cisco.com>]

At 06:48 PM 3/3/2005 -0500, Avi Lior wrote:



> > Since this is an individual submission & not a WG document, I
> > wouldn't feel at all comfortable dictating text to the
> > authors.  My guess is that this is between them and the IESG (sorry!).
>
> But we can help.  And actually - although I wasn't around at the start - I
> think we should have done something about this earlier. Since we all
> indicated that we knew about the Access-Reject problem.
>
> I know that Thomas asked 3GPP2 and 3GPP2 did review the document from their
> prespective.

AFAIK we did a quick review of the document in 3GPP2 and didn't have any
objections to IETF publishing it as an informational RFC. So, there seems to be
a protocol violation that we missed since we didn't review it very 
carefully. VZN
chose not to standardize it in 3GPP2 so it remains a proprietary protocol
even though it's published by IETF. It's an "informational" not a standard RFC.
Doesn't "informational" mean that "this is my way of doing things and if 
you want
to inter-operate with my network you can do it this way but you don't have to"?

-Parviz


> > >
> > > - Mark
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> >
> > ~gwz
> >
> > Why is it that most of the world's problems can't be solved by simply
> >   listening to John Coltrane? -- Henry Gabriel
> >
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>