Re: Possible issue for clarification -- RADIUS Accounting

[Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>]

On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 06:07:40PM -0500, Nelson, David wrote:
> 
> Since the purpose of the Interim-Update is to provide a snap-shot of the
> accounting statistics at that moment in time, I see no reason why the
> octet counts and session time attributes ought not to be included.  Is
> this potentially an erratum in RFC 2866? Or was there a good reason to
> omit these accounting statistics from the Interim-Update messages?

I believe you are correct, and this was simply an oversight.
Regards,
Barney

-- 
Barney Wolff         http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf
I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>