[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: AAAEXT charter, Take 1
Is the scope of work going to remain the same?
If not, how do limited resources get mapped between RADIUS/Diameter?
Will the combining of the WGs further delay RADIUS EXT WG. If yes then I
would vote for not combining the groups. If however, the effect is to
somehow accelerate the WG and work items then I would support this effort.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernard Aboba [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:52 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: RE: AAAEXT charter, Take 1
> > For what its worth, I agree with Jari's suggested modified
> charter. I
> > have more interest in the converged view of supporting both
> RADIUS &
> > Diameter, so I'm motivated by Jari's charter to be involved.
> How do other participants feel about a "AAAEXT" charter?
> Should we rename the potential WG and re-orient towards
> handling both RADIUS and Diameter in a single WG?
> to unsubscribe send a message to
> firstname.lastname@example.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in
> a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.