[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
If not BOF then WG?
Based on this email(below) then are we to conclude that there is still a
move to progress towards a RADIUS working group?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernard Aboba [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 2:42 PM
> To: Greg Weber
> Cc: Joel M. Halpern; firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: RADIUS and complex attributes
> > I think it would be very helpful to produce some more modern
> > recommendations on how to
> format/tag/concatenate/encrypt/etc VSAs and
> > when to pursue IETF space use vs. vendor (SDO) specific.
> Perhaps this
> > is worthy of charter work-item inclusion.
> I think it is. There has been some discussion about one of
> the following types of documents:
> a. RADIUS Implementation Issues and Fixes
> b. RADIUS attribute design guidelines
> to unsubscribe send a message to
> email@example.com with the word 'unsubscribe' in
> a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.