[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: questions/comments on draft-black-radius-lanedge-00.txt
See the comment inline.
> > 3) The draft proposes a new Time attribute (along with Location-ID
> > and Location Name). Why can't we use Event-TimeStamp define in RFC-2869
> > which is also in UTC format? Is there a specific reason to have a new
> > defined here again?
> The Event-Timestamp of RFC-2869 is defined to be an Accounting-Request
> packet attribute. Perhaps for standardization this attribute could be
> carried in either an Access-Request or an Accounting-Request packet?
<Nagi> RFC-3576 ( Dynamic authorization extensions) does recommend Event Time
Stamp to support replay detection. I believe the restriction is already lifted
for Disconnect and CoA messages. Perhaps this is the right time to make the
attribute applicable to all messages.
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.