[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Comments on draft-adrangi-radius-extension-for-pwlan-00.txt
I have read
and have some questions and comments:
o I have stated previously that I would in general like to
see separate attributes rather than a new syntax within
a value. The location attribute would be more useful with
separate attributes for city etc, imho.
And again, this is pretty general, not tied to PWLANs...
o I dislike the Sect 2.2 string syntax, as it is hard
to make this really work in a consistent manner across
vendors and organizations. A standardized bit pattern
approach would be better, IMHO. Then again, I'm not sure
whether we should really extend RADIUS with a feature
o I like the address range accounting control attributes.
o Sect 2.6 (address type) does not describe what to do
for IPv6... make it clear that it applies to IPv4
o Address type "Public and Private": I have trouble
seeing how this works in IPv4.
o Sect 2.7 overlaps with draft-black. I liked the
draft-black approach better.
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.