[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PSAMP IANA considerations section



Hi Benoit,

--On 2/27/06 4:41 PM +0100 Benoit Claise wrote:

Juergen,

This open issue should find a solution for the next version of the draft, to be published by Monday.
See inline.
--On 21.12.2005 11:14 Uhr +0100 Benoit Claise wrote:

Dear all,

Here is a proposal for the IANA considerations section.


1. 9. IANA Considerations

The PSAMP Protocol, as set out in this document, has two sets of
assigned numbers.  Considerations for assigning them are discussed in
this section, using the example policies as set out in the
"Guidelines for IANA Considerations" document IANA-RFC
[RFC2434].

     9.1 IPFIX Related Considerations

As the PSAMP protocol uses the IPFIX protocol, refer to the IANA
considerations section in [IPFIX-PROTO] for the assignments of
numbers used in the protocol and for the numbers used in the
information model.

      9.2 PSAMP Related Considerations

Each new selection method MUST be assigned a unique value for the
selectorAlgorithm Information Element.  Its configuration
parameter(s), along with the way to report it/them with an Options
Template, MUST be clearly specified.

Each new selection method MUST be assigned a unique value for the
selectorAlgorithm Information Element.  New assignments for the PSAMP
selection method will be administered by IANA, on a First Come First
Served basis [RFC 2434], subject to Expert
Review [RFC 2434], i.e. review by one of a group of experts
designated by an IETF Operations and Management Area Director.  The
group of experts must double check the Information Elements
definitions with already defined Information Elements for
completeness, accuracy and redundancy.  Those experts will initially
be drawn from the Working Group Chairs and document editors of the
IPFIX and PSAMP Working Groups.

Now, two questions:
1. I'm not too sure whether we should mandate a new IETF RFC for the
new selection method description?

This would be a tough requirement.  However, it would make sure that the
new methods is well documented.
So the text proposal is fine with you, right?

Yes.

Thanks,

   Juergen



--
to unsubscribe send a message to psamp-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/psamp/>