Dear all,
PROTO-108 Have a statement that this protocol specification
meets all requirements for the PSAMP protocol stated in the framework
except ... An then have a list of bullets, where at minimum there is
stated "not yet covered" or a longer explanation why it is not
covered. This would be replacement for the long list of requirements
in section 6.1
The section 6.1 was created as an intermediate step while producing the
full PSAMP specifications.
Therefore, there is no point anymore to explain, next to each
[PSAMP-FMWK] requirements, how IPFIX/PSAMP fulfills it... as all is
specified in details in the other sections of the draft.
The section 6.1 should be removed and the following text proposal
should be added at the end of section 6
The PSAMP protocol specifications meets all the protocol
requirements stated in the PSAMP framework document [PSAMP-FMWK]:
* Extensibility
* Parallel measurement processes
* Encrypted packets
* Indication of information loss
* Accuracy
* Privacy
* Timeliness
* Congestion avoidance
* Secure export:
* Export rate limit
* Microsecond timestamp resolution
With the choice of IPFIX as PSAMP export protocol,
the
compression option mentioned in the framework document [PSAMP-FMWK] is
not addressed.
If you object, please let me know.
Regards, Benoit.
|