[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Open Issue 5: PSAMP transport protocol
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On
> Of Benoit Claise
> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 8:50 AM
> To: psamp
> Subject: Open Issue 5: PSAMP transport protocol
> Dear all,
> The PSAMP open issue 5 is the following:
> Transport protocol: SCTP and/or UDP and/or TCP. Nothing is mentioned
> this stage. [PSAMP-FMWK] and PSAMP charter specifically mention UDP.
> Currently, we don't mention anything regarding the transport protocol
> selection in [PSAMP-PROTO].
> However, I think that we don't need to specify anything as we have
> sentence in the draft:
> "The entire IPFIX protocol specifications [IPFIX-PROTO] MUST be
> implemented for the PSAMP export."
> This allows the same transport protocol choices as specified in
Requiring implementation of the entire IPFIX protocol is stronger than
requiring the same transport protocol choices.
According to [PSAMP-FMWK], not all of IPFIX need be implemented, see
"On the other
hand, not all features of the IPFIX protocol will need to be
implemented by some PSAMP devices. For example, a device that
offers only content-independent sampling and basic PSAMP
reporting has no need to support IPFIX capabilities based on
> Please let me know if you disagree.
> Regards, Benoit.
> to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/psamp/>
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.