Benoit Claise [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Friday, August
06, 2004 2:16
Statement for the sampling techniques draft
There is a more recent and specific IP statement from AT&T that will be
referred to in the next version of the framework draft:
This is good, as this is more
However, shouldn't you mention to which hashing/filtering/sampling
your IPR refers.
Concerning other assertions of IP rights, I was referring to the
following psamp specific statement from Cisco, which will also be
referred to in the next version:
From: Benoit Claise [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 9:30 PM
Subject: Intellectual Property Statement for the sampling techniques
During his session, Nick Duffield mentioned that he wrote an IPR
in the sampling techniques draft, and that potentially we might need
I started to investigate and this leads me to this question.
The IPR statement is pretty vague, specifically if I follow the link
Intellectual Property Statement
AT&T Corporation may own intellectual property applicable to
contribution. The IETF has been notified of AT&T's licensing
intent for the specification contained in this document. See
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/IPR/ATT-GENERAL.txt for AT&T's IPR
Should we specify exactly which method(s) AT&T has got a patent for?
what is the patent number?
For example, the NetFlow IPR is pretty unambiguous.
Thanks for shedding some light.
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.