[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Intellectual Property Statement for the sampling techniques draft
There is a more recent and specific IP statement from AT&T that will be
referred to in the next version of the framework draft:
Concerning other assertions of IP rights, I was referring to the
following psamp specific statement from Cisco, which will also be
referred to in the next version:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benoit Claise [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 9:30 PM
> To: psamp
> Subject: Intellectual Property Statement for the sampling techniques
> During his session, Nick Duffield mentioned that he wrote an IPR
> in the sampling techniques draft, and that potentially we might need
> for NetFlow.
> I started to investigate and this leads me to this question.
> The IPR statement is pretty vague, specifically if I follow the link
> Intellectual Property Statement
> AT&T Corporation may own intellectual property applicable to
> contribution. The IETF has been notified of AT&T's licensing
> intent for the specification contained in this document. See
> http://www.ietf.org/ietf/IPR/ATT-GENERAL.txt for AT&T's IPR
> Should we specify exactly which method(s) AT&T has got a patent for?
> what is the patent number?
> For example, the NetFlow IPR is pretty unambiguous.
> Thanks for shedding some light.
> Regards, Benoit.
> to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/psamp/>
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.