[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What about X.805? (was RE: Control Plane Security of ISP Network)
On 6/6/05, Barry Greene (bgreene) <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> For definitions, why not use X.805? What are people's thoughts on X.805?
Looks very well thought out.
It's focus is end-to-end. Only difference I see is that in OPSEC terms
security is largely about availability of the middle, not the ends.
You could, I suppose, view management-station-to-network-element
as a form of end-to-end.
> Is a good place to start.
Yes. After a quick look, I think it deserves a more thorough look.
Merike (when you get back): what overlaps do you see ?