Re: Referenceing 3704 in OPSEC filtering document ?

[George Jones <eludom@gmail.com>]

On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 17:56:31 -0600, Budd, Fred <Fred.Budd@wiltel.com> wrote:
> From an operations perspective this is one case where the configuration how is as interesting as the functional what (filtering).
> 
> There are three possibilities that come to mind immediately:
> - manual configuration (implementation being static ACLs)
> - dynamic based on something known (implementation being uRPF)
> - triggered by external source/API (implementation being shunning, quarantine, VOIP midcom pinholes)
> 
> It adds some complexity to the draft, but gives more flexibility in mapping capabilities to profiles, or requirements docs.

I'm not sure I'm following you.  What are you saying we shuold do in
which drafts
(Merike's practices survey, Chris' filtering features vs. what's in 3704 now ?)

---George