[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Straw-man charter
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, David B Harrington wrote:
> I don't think size is a good choice for differentiating requirements.
> Requirements should be mapped to functionality.
Agreed. That makes $0.04.
I think the key destinction here is transit. CSPs (per Don's
definition) are not providing transit. They are hosting
applications. That is a whole different ballgame. I think
here we want to stick with management of NEs that provide
transit @ layers 2 & 3.
I will say that, to some degree, size does matter. LARGE nets
may manage out of band with a completely redundant IP network.
They will have requirements driven by this.