Some of you may be interested in this. It is a liaison statement from TMOC to IETF OPS NM AD and to OPSEC WG. I am already sending a response that their references to the SNMP RFCs are VEYR VERY outdated. I have not look at this in detail. Probably best to provide feedback via OPSEC WG. Bert -----Original Message----- From: Fargano, Michael [mailto:Michael.Fargano@qwest.com] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 17:30 To: ppecha@telcordia.com; lmak@lucent.com; J.Schmidt@Motorola.com; lmcedts@LMC.ERICSSON.SE; bwijnen@lucent.com; pcain@acmehacking.com; rcallon@juniper.net; sts@anglianet.co.uk; mcreaner@tmforum.org; felix.flemisch@siemens.com; Michael.Truss@Motorola.com; djsidor@nortelnetworks.com; geoff@caryer.co.uk; schishol@nortelnetworks.com; Jim.D.Jones@alcatel.com; cjblum@lucent.com; rcheruku@cisco.com; manager@metroethernetforum.org; hklam@lucent.com; gyoung@dslforum.org Cc: rroman@telcordia.com; Lakshmi.Raman@Radisys.com; Lam, Hing-Kam (Kam); Chris Lonvick; Joseph Salowey; Andre, Nick; Nicole Butler; Catrina Akers; Steve Barclay; JPEmard@atis.org Subject: TMOC Liaison - Security Management System (TMOC Issue 56) Industry Leaders: Please see attached liaison/correspondence from TMOC. Thanks, Mike ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Fargano Industry Standards Program Manager Qwest Office of the CTO Email: Michael.Fargano@Qwest.com Phone: 303-896-3618
Attachment:
TMOC-2005-007 Liaison RE Sec Mgt System.pdf
Description: Binary data