RE: [Diffserv] Policy Terminology Draft

["Andrea Westerinen" <andreaw@cisco.com>]

Yes - that is the right assumption.
Andrea

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nim@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-nim@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of
Tom Scott
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 3:37 AM
To: Policy Terminology Draft Editor; nim@psg.com
Subject: re: [Diffserv] Policy Terminology Draft


On  Fri, 18 Aug 2000 00:49:23 -0700 "Andrea Westerinen"
<andreaw@cisco.com> wrote:
> The Policy Framework WG has created an I-D to try to disambiguate 
> policy terminology across all IETF Work Groups.

Andrea,

Disambiguation is a Good Thing. May I assume that this draft
is a step toward a unified model of information and data for
policy, management, services and protocol development?

--Cheers, Tom
---------------------------------------------------
Tom Nelson Scott             Vedatel Co
1411 Sheffield Dr.           Bowling Green OH 43402
"In IP We Trust"   "Java Rules"   "E Pluribus Unix"
---------------------------------------------------



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Diffserv] Policy Terminology Draft
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 00:49:23 -0700
From: "Andrea Westerinen" <andreaw@cisco.com>
To: "Diffserv@Ietf. Org" <diffserv@ietf.org>

The Policy Framework WG has created an I-D to try to
disambiguate policy
terminology across all IETF Work Groups.  This draft is
located at:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-policy-terminology-00.txt

In creating the draft, the team tried to look across all
RFCs and WGs to
gain an understanding of policy and its applicability, and
consolidate
definitions.  At the Pittsburgh Policy Framework session, it
was recommended
that this draft be forwarded to all work groups where it may
be applicable.
(If you receive multiple copies, my apologies.)

Please look the draft over, and if you have feedback, please
reply to me
and/or to the policy mail list (policy@raleigh.ibm.com). 
Some questions to
be considered are ... Are there definitions that should be
updated?  Are
there additional terms that should be defined?

For the current terms in the draft, please try to use these
terms
consistently.  Our goal is to take this draft through the
standards process
and have it serve a function similar to RFC2828.

Thanks.
Andrea Westerinen
Policy Terminology Draft Editor


_______________________________________________
diffserv mailing list
diffserv@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
Archive: http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/diff-serv-arch/