[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Session reuse
Balazs Lengyel wrote:
As I remember you mentioned you hoped to reach consensus on session
reuse before the IETF meeting. Could you summarize how you see the state
I was hoping we could finish up event classes before the meeting.
The other issue that seems to be finishing up is the use of existing
configuration RPCs instead of new subscription RPCs for conveying
notification generation parameters.
Not session reuse. RPC reuse.
I think there is WG consensus that notification generation parameters
need to be capable of being NV-stored, and that existing RPCs for
manipulating configuration data must be used for this purpose.
There have also been multiple objections to having overlapping
subscription and configuration based mechanisms, so IMO there is
also WG consensus to limit any new RPCs to new features which
do not duplicate existing RPCs.
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.