[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: minor <lock> ambiguity

Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:

I agree with this logic and support the statements
by Andy and Martin


So here is the RFC Editor note:

draft-ietf-netconf-prot-12.txt, page 46, para 6:

OLD:

    A lock MUST not be granted if any of the following conditions are
    true:

      *  a lock is already held by another NETCONF session or another
                                   ^^^^^^^
         entity

NEW:

    A lock MUST not be granted if any of the following conditions are
    true:

      *  a lock is already held by any NETCONF session or another
         entity





Bert


Andy


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>