[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: simplified XSD issue
W.r.t. extensibility, it would be good to read/consider
It is still a draft and may change quite a bit.
But it gives you some insight in the current thinking we
have in IESG on this topic.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Goddard [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: vrijdag 31 oktober 2003 0:41
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: simplified XSD issue
> The previous question on XSD alternatives for NETCONF
> was mired in detail; here is a simplified version
> that focuses on one of the issues:
> The NETCONF operations will initially be defined
> by a single XML schema document.
> Should it be possible to define additional operations
> by publishing additional schema documents, or should
> extension require an entirely new version of the base
> document? Should extension be prohibited?
> to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.