[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: something to note about the SSH draft

Eliot Lear writes:
>What I had in mind was that you either use a particular transport 
>connection for RPCs *OR* notifications.

I agree that using one ssh connection for both will be
a bit painful, but what will the notifications look
like?  Will there be a series of <notifications>
elements or a single one containing a stream of
rfc3195 entries?

Thanks,
 Phil


<notification>
  <entry facility='8' severity='6'
   hostname='pipeworks'
   timestamp='Oct 31 23:59:59'
  >&lt;.....eeeek!</entry>
  <entry> ...</entry>
  <entry>...</entry>
  ...

or:

<notification>
  <entry>...</entry>
</notification>
<notification>
  <entry>...</entry>
</notification>
<notification>
  <entry>...</entry>
</notification>
<notification>
  <entry>...</entry>
</notification>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>