[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FW: FW: FW: RFC3535 question/clarification

To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Subject: Re: FW: FW: FW: RFC3535 question/clarification
From: Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 15:04:17 -0400
Cc: "Netconf (E-mail)" <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 15 Sep 2003 20:28:10 +0200." <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B1550233156F@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" writes:
>In the mid-90s at least, cisco IOS (on the routers) absolutely
>did know internally which was configured manually and which was
>learned (e.g. via BGP, OSPF).

Is this correct? If so, why does IOS drop default values? Or is
this unrelated?

Thanks,
 Phil

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FW: FW: FW: RFC3535 question/clarification
  - From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>

References:
- FW: FW: FW: RFC3535 question/clarification
  - From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>

Prev by Date: Re: FW: FW: FW: RFC3535 question/clarification
Next by Date: Re: Multiple "Running" configurations
Previous by thread: FW: FW: FW: RFC3535 question/clarification
Next by thread: Re: FW: FW: FW: RFC3535 question/clarification
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread