RE: Dynamic vs Static and Automated vs Interactive

["Hunkins, Andrew" <ahunkins@unimax.com>]

Okay.  Fair enough.  This really helps define what we're try to
accomplish and who we're serving, and therefore helps me constrain
comments towards that goal.

Thank you.

-Andrew


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Shafer [mailto:phil@juniper.net]
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:22 PM
> To: Hunkins, Andrew
> Cc: Margaret Wasserman; Randy Presuhn; netconf@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Dynamic vs Static and Automated vs Interactive 
> 
> 
> "Hunkins, Andrew" writes:
> >In fact I *do* see that as the phases the market will 
> progress through.
> 
> It may be, but the current target audience includes script writers,
> and if we define a solution that doesn't cover their needs, we lose.
> The world will not turn overnight and trying to force it won't make
> it happen. We're aiming for something that will trigger an evolution,
> not mandate a new world order.
> 
> Plan for the future; deal with the present.
> 
> Thanks,
>  Phil
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>