RE: netconf WG charter proposal

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> There are alternatives to these features today -- the NMS
> application has to provide rollback or check for multiple
> config-writers.  I agree a device is more manageable if
> these are embedded features.  I would prefer to see multiple
> conformance levels rather than one bar, set way too high.

can an 'external' system can not provide a transaction model if the
devices do not have the primitive mechanisms needed to implement
it?

randy


--
to unsubscribe send a message to xmlconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/xmlconf/>