[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: netconf WG charter proposal

To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: netconf WG charter proposal
From: Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 13:40:13 -0500
Cc: xmlconf@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 04 Apr 2003 10:26:33 PST." <004801c2fad7$b8de8a60$7f1afea9@oemcomputer>

"Randy Presuhn" writes:
>If the config/state distinction only shows up at the protocol level,
>then we'll end up with the "device is configuration of record"

Can you explain this a bit? I don't see one following the other.

Thanks,
 Phil

--
to unsubscribe send a message to xmlconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/xmlconf/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: netconf WG charter proposal
  - From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>

References:
- Re: netconf WG charter proposal
  - From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>

Prev by Date: Re: netconf WG charter proposal
Next by Date: Re: netconf WG charter proposal
Previous by thread: Re: netconf WG charter proposal
Next by thread: Re: netconf WG charter proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread