[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmlconf-authors] RE: first draft of Netconf WG charter
- To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
- Subject: Re: [xmlconf-authors] RE: first draft of Netconf WG charter
- From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 22:53:18 -0800
- Cc: xml config list <xmlconf@ops.ietf.org>
- References: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15501483CEB@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com><4.3.2.7.2.20030402162932.00b12cb0@fedex.cisco.com><20030403020714.GC44456@sapphire.juniper.net><E190uCe-0004qa-00@ran.psg.com><3E8BCA51.3050406@cisco.com><E190xbu-0005BW-00@ran.psg.com><3E8BCC4F.5010103@cisco.com><E190xi7-0005Bs-00@ran.psg.com><3E8BD799.4030200@cisco.com>
>> i believe that the indetity and authority models are absolutely
>> necessary.
>
> Ok- just to be clear, we should add words into the charter about each of
> these topics a'la:
not clear, as my AD hat is off.
> ... the working group will address requirements for standard methods of
> identitying principles, such as user names or distinguished names.
>
> similarly, the working group will visit authorization and do an initial
> investigation as to how the model should be specified.
>
> Do I have the concept right, at least?
yes. but note that these are merely my personal opinions, and not my
position as AD, which i have yet to consider. follow bert, not me.
randy
--
to unsubscribe send a message to xmlconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/xmlconf/>