[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: netconf and working "on the box"

To: Faye Ly <faye@pedestalnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: netconf and working "on the box"
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 01:59:40 -0800
Cc: RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>, xmlconf <xmlconf@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <93401232EABAAB4EA430E13ECC701CCF04BFB2@yorktown.pedestalnetworks.com>
References: <93401232EABAAB4EA430E13ECC701CCF04BFB2@yorktown.pedestalnetworks.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030307

All,

Since the model doesn't really change, as we've all agreed, why is this argument at all interesting?

Eliot

--
to unsubscribe send a message to xmlconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/xmlconf/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: netconf and working "on the box"
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>

References:
- RE: netconf and working "on the box"
  - From: "Faye Ly" <faye@pedestalnetworks.com>

Prev by Date: RE: netconf and working "on the box"
Next by Date: Re: netconf and working "on the box"
Previous by thread: RE: netconf and working "on the box"
Next by thread: Re: netconf and working "on the box"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread