[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (v6ops) WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-renumbering-procedure-00.txt (fwd)
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Fred Baker wrote:
> >A few paragraphs along the lines of "ask one ISP to temporarily accept
> >packets with the other's addresses and use that one for outgoing traffic
> >or use policy routing to match ISPs to the source addresses in outgoing
> >packets, or if these approaches aren't possible, implement a flag-day type
> >of transition" would be very helpful, I think.
> In a word, no.
A possible compromise here could be putting RFC3704 in as a
*normative* reference (btw, some of those other ones might be as well
because they're required for understanding), implying that it's a MUST
read.. which could be interpreted as not having to summarize or
repeats its contents here.
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings