[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: on the point of mobility & multihoming
Brian E Carpenter;
Dave and Geoff completely misunderstand the relationships
between M6 and MIP.
Worse, they don't recognize that shim layer approaches are
making the the IP layer connection oriented by let it maintain
states of connections.
Please do not over-simplify and please do not personalize this
You over-simplify and personalize the discussion. Don't to that.
The over-simplification, for example, is to just say "state"
even though the text you quoted says "states of connecitons".
It is interprested as an intentional rude behaviour, regadless
of whether you said "please" several times.
We all understand, I assume, that site
multihoming implies state.
You are lying of the worst lie to state the half truth.
The proper statement on state is that "multihoming for connection
implies states of connections".
The architectural analysis is not supposed to *define* the solution,
Thank you for acknowledging you are doing nothing other than
abstract nonsense on impossible options.
Geoff's presentation is nothing more than rhetorical combinations
of layers without analyzing architectural implications.
Please do not insult our colleague.
It is a proper critic on a presentation of someone who you
If the quality of document or presentation from the person you
yourself choose, it is perfectly OK to say the document or
the presentation is poor with reasons such as "hetorical
combinations of layers without analyzing architectural
Ignore their documents.
Please do not make such rude statements on this mailing list.
You are rude.
You give any technical point, save for the half truth above.