[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: on the point of mobility & multihoming
Kanchei Loa wrote:
Thus, in my proposal, details of possible mobility solution is
dropped, though minimal explanation on why a bit is reserved is
In my opinion, you just hit an important issue of multi6 architecture, which
this WG is supposed to work on first.
I'm afraid you miss my points.
If we take Dave Croker's scenario
(suggested by Geoff Huston) and generalize it, the problem space is the same
as depicted in Geoff's slide (page 3) of "An Architectural View of Multi6
Dave and Geoff completely misunderstand the relationships
between M6 and MIP.
Worse, they don't recognize that shim layer approaches are
making the the IP layer connection oriented by let it maintain
states of connections.
Geoff's presentation is nothing more than rhetorical combinations
of layers without analyzing architectural implications.
Ignore their documents.