[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: on the point of mobility & multihoming
They have certain similarity that if we are going to solve mobility
issue in a way different from MIPv6, which is hopeless, minor details
of M6 design will be affected.
My opinion, for what it's worth, is that we're not out to solve the
mobility issue in Multi6. I don't think we want to advertise that
we will work on mobility, as mobility has out of scope. If we are
clever, the solution for multihoming will be useful for mobility.
However, I would not like multi6 to get a storm of drafts about
mobility when we are chartered to solve multihoming.
I fully agree with you.
Proposals from those who half understand the relationships
will be really annoying.
Thus, in my proposal, details of possible mobility solution is
dropped, though minimal explanation on why a bit is reserved is