[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: security requirement for multi6
Even more importantly, we shouldn't create new ones.
Especially ones that are hard to detect.
This is an operations group: let's not make operations
any harder than they already are.
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist [mailto:email@example.com]
| Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 8:07 PM
| To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
| Cc: Masataka Ohta; Multi6 Mailing List
| Subject: Re: security requirement for multi6
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
| Hash: SHA1
| On torsdag, nov 13, 2003, at 00:33 Europe/Stockholm, Iljitsch van
| Beijnum wrote:
| >> That is, that you happen to find a way of DoS does not mean other
| >> forms of DoS is not possible.
| > Still, I think this new kind of denial of service is bad
| enough that
| > we shouldn't allow this to happen, even though other
| denial of service
| > attacks are also possible today. Hopefully we'll be able to do
| > something about that in the future.
| Just because there are DoS possibilities that we do not yet
| know about,
| does not mean that we should not fix the ones that we do know about,
| and also know how to fix.
| - - kurtis -
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
| Version: PGP 8.0.2
| -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----