[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mutli6 meeting in Vienna
> >> As I said yesterday, we will not have time at this meeting for all the
> >> proposals to present.
> > Are you saying that you have tried to request 3 slots and denied by
> > IESG?
> > Or, are you just saying you are not so sure?
> I am saying that I do not think it would be useful for us to request
> three slots. I don't think that will move us forward.
You mean you shall not have time.
I don't think it a good management of WG.
> > That's why I'm asking for presentation of the overview on end to
> > end multihoming.
> I think we are looking at one single presentation listing the solution
> classes. Pekka have volunteered to make such a presentation and we will
> most likely take him up on this offer.
Having presentation by Pekka, you will get view of Pekka, but nothing
more than that, which is not so productive.
> > What do you want to discuss on solution classes? Isn't it already
> > obvious that the only solution class is host-based one with loc/id
> > separation?
> I said I wanted an overview. If that means discussion or not remains to
> be seen. I would personally be happier if not.
> I don't think that there is a clear view on host based solutions vs
> loc/id and I am definitely not sure that host-based with loc/id is
> obvious. But that is why we are having this discussion.
That is not a productive way of discussion.
Discussion on solution classes, if any, should be more abstact
and should not be based on specific proposals.
Overview on specific proposals is a different topic.