[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
> >> > A better way to move forward is most likely to have the IETF
> >> > _cooperate_ with the RIRs on a working policy.
> >> bingo!
> > YES!
> Perhaps, say, Thomas Narten, Takeshi Arano, or David Kessens could work
> with ARIN and the other RIRs to come up with IPv6 policies?
None of them is IETF.
> Or maybe
> folks from IPng like Bob Hinden could run drafts of proposals for
> addressing architectures by the RIRs for input?
IPng WG has no idea on addressing architecture for multihoming.
IPng WG has no idea on how global routing table size should