[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Monday, Feb 17, 2003, at 05:44 America/Montreal, marcelo bagnulo
I guess that the long answer to your question can be found at:
That draft was never published as an RFC mostly because the IESG, IAB,
and several IETF Security Directorate members believed that it was not
factually correct. The biggest issue is that it does not describe
the actual GSE/8+8 proposal accurately -- so the criticisms are of
something not quite the same as GSE/8+8. This is NOT to imply that
the IESG, IAB, or other folks thought that GSE/8+8 was without
problems -- merely that the above draft was not on-target in its claims.
So folks should add a lot of salt when reading that draft.
Please lets move forward on multi6, rather than revisiting painful old
IPng WG history here.
- Re: GSE
- From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
- Re: GSE
- From: marcelo bagnulo <email@example.com>