[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
8+8 and locator based approaches
> I think that Iljitsch's note is a fine reminder that different folks
> have very different understandings of what the term "GSE" means.
GSE is defined clearly with no different understandings except
for that you just invented.
Thank you for your creativity.
> For my part, I agree with tli, jnc, and others that the best
> approach to supporting multi-homing while not hosing the operational
> in the DFZ is to separate host identity from routing goop.
There are several such proposals found in big internet mailing
Call them 8+8 or 6+2+8 but not GSE.
Also, say "locator", not "routing goop".
As for GSE, it appeared much later but is hopeless.
GSE, for example, leaves dependency betwen identifier and locators.
- Re: GSE
- From: RJ Atkinson <firstname.lastname@example.org>