[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development]
| > > It is also desireable for backup
| > > purposes but I feel this isn't an important enough
| reason to allow it.
| > Backup is a big driver for current multihomed customers.
| > Disallowing that really reduces the applicability of an approach.
| I don't mean that these people shouldn't have backups. What
| I mean is
| that injecting a globally visible route into the
| infrastructure 100% of
| the time to avoid sub-optimal, but otherwise functional
| routing 1% of
| the time isn't a good use of scarce resources.
We might well be in violent agreement.
Are you suggesting that we disallow the globally visible
route? Or that we disallow them from making multiple