[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> Unless I'm mistaken nobody here has proposed a solution that
> has this problem. If/when addresses are changed somewhere,
> they are either changed back later,
Through a complex mechanism that scales worse than inter-domain
multicast. Since that has proven to be a real deployment challenge, why
do we think magic translator protocols are going to be any better?
> or the destination is
> aware of the relationship between the old and new address. In
> other words: any address that an application communicates to
> the other end remains valid. Reachable is another question...
> Apps should consider using more than one address.