[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development
> > I would love to be able to agree with you. Of course I do agree
> > that multi-homing is a must-have. But we just can't put the BGP4+
> > table on the exponential path. It's very unfortunate that this WG
> > has made no progress on resolving that dilemma.
> I figured the whole geographical aggregation thing was a step in the
> right direction...
A problem is that such geographical aggregation can not properly
handle multiple links between regions maintained by multiple entities.
Another problem is that it is helpless for a partitioned geographical