[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Recommendation v Requirements [Re: The state of IPv6 multihomingdevelopment
Eliot Lear wrote:
> Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > Sure. And in answer to Eliot, its usefulness is to provide
> > a frame in which to think about proposed solutions.
> Given the document will have no force, I suppose I don't care all too
> much. My point, however, is that the frame appears currently more like
> an overly constraining box.
We're engineers and should be used to designing in overconstrained
spaces. I just like to know what the constraints are.
I'm sure we don't need a recharter to downgrade the requirements
deliverable to an Informational.