[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Sean Doran wrote:
> Would anyone like to comment on draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03?
Since you ask... The requirements all seem very reasonable to me. (Many
pretty much go without saying.) I only have two problems:
- multihoming gets blamed for the global routing table bloat, while
the number of active routes vs the number of active ASNs clearly shows
this is only a small factor at this time
- what happens when there is no multihoming solution that meets all
requirements? We then forego multihoming in IPv6, or ...? There is only
a perfunctory division of the listed requirements into the classes "must
be supported" and "additional requirements"
> Failing that, please feel free to make meta-comments on whether
> we should start the last call process and move the document along.
Maybe we should have a look at the "goals and milestones" section of the
charter for guidance.
Iljitsch van Beijnum