[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits [was: : (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting]
| Perhaps the chairs could hazard an opinion as to whether the most
| recent list of changes floated by Michel seems to reflect the wg's
I would like to see a positive expression of consensus on this,
rather than just accepting a possible silence as consent.
If there are at least five "yes, it's OK" messages to the list,
and zero "no" messages, I would take that as an expression of
If there is a combination of "yes" and "no" votes, we will have
to discuss things further in an effort to build a clear consensus.
All - please register your opinion, or even a meta-opinion on this
opinion-gathering, on the multi6 list.