[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *LA questions [was Re: initial issues]
> Randy, since I haven't seen any discussion of this on the ipngwg list
sorry. due to load, i have not been reading it for a while.
> 1. Are you asserting that concept of a site is dead? If not, then SLA
> and /48 is definitely not dead. (If yes, then we have a big problem
> but I won't argue it here and now.)
nope. no the concept of a site is fine. there are folk with qualms about
/48. i suspect that the current discussion/direction may help resolve that.
> 2. Are you asserting that concept of a hierarchy of providers is dead?
putting it in the architecture is useless as this is lawyer bait.