[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: initial issues
| IPv6 NLA and TLA do not represent a direct equivalence
| to IPv4 classes. To state otherwise represents a confusion
| of some sort...
No, I was pushing a button I saw pushed elsewhere & it was "cute",
so I just copy-cat-called by reflex.
I've promised Thomas that I'll try to be good and constructive.
Don't be so sour at me just because I find it difficult. :-)
| Further, to make multi-homing work well does NOT require
| that TLA or NLA disappear, as some well-formed pre-existing
| proposals demonstrate quite nicely.
For example, you can set both fields to zero or treat both as "don't care"...?
If there is already a fully formed proposal, why does this wg exist?
If it exists to consider this proposal (among others), where is the draft?
ps: okay technically it doesn't exist yet...