[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [midcom] MIDCOM MIB design question
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Quittek [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> --On 12.12.2003 12:24 Uhr -0500 Harrington, David wrote:
> > The WG has selected SNMPv3 as the protocol (as the result of a
> > comparison of five existing IETF protocols), but most of
> the WG are not
> > very SNMP-savvy and have difficulty conceptualizing the
> solution in SNMP
> > terms.
> Thank you for the compliment.
> The point is that the SNMP community in turn is not very MIDCOM-savvy,
> so it is not that easy to produce a standard that satisfies
> both parties.
Agreed. Uh ... And thanks for the compliment ;-)
And, let me thank you for driving hard to bridge the chasm between our
> Thank you for your patience. I am afraid we MIDCOM people will need
> more of it until the MIDCOM MIB is mature. I guess we are
> still welcome
> to ask ignorant questions ;-)
As long as I'm still welcome to ask ignorant questions about MIDCOM as