RE: FW: FlowId and FlowIdOrAny

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

I would think that if flowID is needed in INDEX clause
one would use FlowId and not FlowIdOrAny

Same issue exists for example for Dscp and DscpOrAny in
the DIFFSERV-TC-MIB

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Presuhn [mailto:randy_presuhn@mindspring.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 28 januari 2003 1:20
> To: mibs@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: FW: FlowId and FlowIdOrAny
> 
> 
> Hi -
> 
> > From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
> > To: <mibs@ops.ietf.org>
> > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:57 PM
> > Subject: FW: FW: FlowId and FlowIdOrAny
> >
> 
> > Just in case any of you has a comment or concern
> ...
> >   FlowIdOrAny       TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
> >       DISPLAY-HINT "d"
> >       STATUS        current
> >       DESCRIPTION  "The flow identifier or flow lable in an IPv6
> >                     header that may be used to discriminate traffic
> >                     flows.  The value of -1 is used to indicate a
> >                     wildcard, i.e. any value.
> >                    "
> >       SYNTAX        Integer32 (-1 | 0..1048575)
> ...
> 
> Does it worry anyone else that objects defined using this TC would
> not be usable in INDEX clauses?
> 
> Randy
> 
> 
>