[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FW: FlowId and FlowIdOrAny
At 04:20 PM 1/27/2003 -0800, Randy Presuhn wrote:
>Hi -
>
>> From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
>> To: <mibs@ops.ietf.org>
>> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:57 PM
>> Subject: FW: FW: FlowId and FlowIdOrAny
>>
>
>> Just in case any of you has a comment or concern
>...
>> FlowIdOrAny TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
>> DISPLAY-HINT "d"
>> STATUS current
>> DESCRIPTION "The flow identifier or flow lable in an IPv6
>> header that may be used to discriminate traffic
>> flows. The value of -1 is used to indicate a
>> wildcard, i.e. any value.
>> "
>> SYNTAX Integer32 (-1 | 0..1048575)
>...
>
>Does it worry anyone else that objects defined using this TC would
>not be usable in INDEX clauses?
No. If there are any MIBs planned or in progress that want to
create a table that would need to model a 'wildcard flow' then
I would change my mind. Is 1048576 a safe choice?
I'm more concerned about:
- label misspelled in the DESCRIPTION clause
- range in the SYNTAX clause should be -1..1048575
- missing REFERENCE clause
>Randy
Andy