RE: Boilerplate

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

And indeed, this Informational doc is not a STD.
Thanks for cathcing that Mike.

Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: C. M. Heard [mailto:heard@pobox.com]
> Sent: woensdag 18 december 2002 18:12
> To: MIBS (E-mail)
> Cc: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Harrington, David
> Subject: RE: Boilerplate
> 
> 
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Harrington, David wrote:
> 
> > The SNMPv3 RFCs have arrived. They are STD62, in RFCs numbered 3410
> > through 3418.
> > 
> > I have updated the boilerplate below accordingly. Please review this
> > proposal, so we can make the new boilerplate available from the O&M
> > web pages.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > dbh
> > 
> > ------------ proposed new boiler plate for MIB documents -----------
> >  
> > 1. The Internet Standard Management Framework
> 
> In order to match what is in RFC 3418 (and also in the first paragraph
> of the boilerplate) the title should read:
> 
> % 1.  The Internet-Standard Management Framework
> 
> (i.e., s/Internet Standard/Internet-Standard).
> 
> >    For a detailed overview of the documents that describe 
> the current
> >    Internet-Standard Management Framework, STD62, please refer to 
>                                              ^^^^^^
> 
> This "STD62," is not present in RFC 3417, RFC 3418, nor in any of the
> previous boilerplate proposals.  It should be removed so that 
> the first
> paragraph should read like this:
> 
> 
> %    For a detailed overview of the documents that describe 
> the current
> %    Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to 
> section 7 of
> %    RFC 3410 [RFC3410].
> 
> Other than that, the proposal looks OK.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mike Heard
>